Influence of Aging Heat Treatment on Pitting Corrosion Resistance of Martensitic Stainless Steel

  • Abdullah Dhayea Assi Middle Technical University/ Institute of Technology- Baghdad/ Baghdad/ Iraq

Abstract

In this research is to study the influence of the aging heat treatment on the pitting corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steel (MSS), where a number of specimens from martensitic stainless steel were subjected to solution treatment at 1100 oC for one hour followed by water quenching then aging in the temperatures range (500-750) oC for different holding times (1,5,10,15&20) hr. Accelerated chemical corrosion test and immersion chemical corrosion test were performed on samples after heat treatment. The results of the research showed that the pitting corrosion resistance is significantly affected by the aging temperature. Where found that the aging samples at a temperature of 500 °C have the highest rate of corrosion which may be due to an increase in the ratio of the Delta type ferrite (δ-ferrite) and very soft precipitates from other phases of heterogeneous form in the basic martensitic phase; which leads to increased corrosion rate, whereas aging   samples in the temperature range (550–650) °C have the smaller rate of corrosion values, this is due to the high volumetric ratio of remaining austenite. The aging samples at temperatures above 650 °C show an average corrosion rate. It was also found that the type of pits resulting from both the chemical corrosion tests and their shape were not related to the ferrite type and the carbides present in the microstructure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Tzaneva, “Effect Of pH on the Corrosion Behaviour Of High Nitrogen Stanless Steel in Chloride Medium,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 48, 4, 2013, pp 383390.

R. C. Newman, “Understanding the Corrosion of Stainless Steel,” Corrosion, Vol. 57, No.12, Dec. 2001, pp1030-1041.

K. Ajay, S. Chaudhary and A. Sharma., “Electrochemical Studies of Stainless Steel Corrosion in Peroxide Solutions”, Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta, 2012, 30(2), 99-109.

J. Tian, W. Wang and M. Babar, “A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy”, Materials 2017, 10, 1293; doi:10.3390/ma10111293

A. Nykiel and J. Kazior, “Effect of Aging Temperature on Corrosion Behavior of Sintered 17-4 PH Stainless Steel in Dilute Sulfuric Acid Solution”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (JMEPEG), Published online 15 June 2017.

C. H. Beraldo, José Wilmar Calderón-Hernández, Rodrigo Magnabosco and Neusa Alonso-Falleiros, “Effect of Aging Heat Treatment H950 and H1000 on Mechanical and Pitting Corrosion Properties of UNS S46500 Stainless Steel”, Materials Research. 2019; 22(1).

AZO-Material, the state of scientific marketing survey, " Martensitic Stainless Steel, Applications", November 1, 2018.

H. Nakagawa, T. Miyazaki and H. Yokota, “Effect of Aging Temperature on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 1.8Cu-7.3Ni-15.9Cr-1.2Mo-low C, N,Martensitic Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel,” Journal of Materials and Science, 35, 2000, pp.2245-2253.

P. Anja and k. Axel, “Local Corrosion of Martensitic Stainless Steels during Exposure to Saline Aquifer Water and CO2 Environment”, International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 2018.

D. Deng,” Microstructural Study of 17-4PH Stainless Steel after Plasma-Transferred Arc Welding”, Materials 2015, 8, 424-434; doi:10.3390/ma8020424.

Z. De-ning., “Influence of Tempering Process on Mechanical Properties of 00Cr13Ni4Mo Super Martensitic Stainless Steel” J. of Iron and Steel Research, International. 17(8), 2010, pp 50-54.

B. Qin., “Effect of Tempering Temperature on Properties of 00Cr16Ni5Mo Stainless Steel”, Materials Characterization, 59, 2008, pp 1096-1100.

Published
2021-03-01
How to Cite
Assi, A. (2021). Influence of Aging Heat Treatment on Pitting Corrosion Resistance of Martensitic Stainless Steel. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, 17(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2021.12.003