Comparative Study between Activated Carbon and Charcoal for the Development of Latent Fingerprints on Nonporous Surfaces

Authors

  • Hadeel Faroak Hameed Department of Biochemical Engineering / Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering/ University of Baghdad/ Iraq
  • Alaa K. Mohammed Department of Biochemical Engineering / Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering/ University of Baghdad/ Iraq
  • Dheaa S. Zageer Forensic DNA center for research and training- College of science/ University of Al-Nahrain/ Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2022.09.001

Abstract

 

For criminal investigations, fingerprints remain the most reliable form of personal identification despite developments in other fields like DNA profiling. The objective of this work is to compare the performance of both commercial charcoal and activated carbon powder derived from the Alhagi plant to reveal latent fingerprints from different non-porous surfaces (cardboard, plain glass, aluminum foil sheet, China Dish, Plastic, and Switch). The effect of three variables on activated carbon production was investigated. These variables were the impregnation ratio (the weight ratio of KOH: dried raw material), the activation temperature, and the activation time. The effect factors were investigated using Central Composite Design (CCD) software. The optimum activation conditions were found as an impregnation ratio of 1:2.6, activated time of 160 min, and temperature of 630oC. The results of the comparison show that Alhagi active carbon powder (AAC) has a high ability to develop latent fingerprints on all surfaces except on plastic surfaces while the commercial charcoal failed to develop the latent fingerprint on both plastic and aluminum foil sheets surfaces. AAC was found to clearly show every feature of the latent fingerprints more than commercial charcoal for both males and females. Also, AAC has the ability to show latent fingerprints till 15 days while commercial charcoal has the ability to show latent fingerprints just till 7 days.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

detecting latent fingerprints: A review,” Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 172–176, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00465-5.

S. D. Salman, “Adsorption of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution onto Sawdust Activated Carbon,” vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 60–69, 2019.

R. Krishnamoorthy, B. Govindan, F. Banat, V. Sagadevan, M. Purushothaman, and P. L. Show, “Date pits activated carbon for divalent lead ions removal,” J. Biosci. Bioeng., vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 88–97, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.12.011.

S. Maulina and M. Iriansyah, “Characteristics of activated carbon resulted from pyrolysis of the oil palm fronds powder,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 309, no. 1, pp. 0–6, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/309/1/012072.

B. Sadhukhan, N. K. Mondal, and S. Chattoraj, “Optimisation using central composite design (CCD) and the desirability function for sorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution onto Lemna major,” Karbala Int. J. Mod. Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–155, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.kijoms.2016.03.005.

A. E. Sarrai et al., “Using central composite experimental design to optimize the degradation of Tylosin from aqueous solution by Photo-Fenton reaction,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 6, 2016, doi: 10.3390/ma9060428.

S. Chattoraj, B. Sadhukhan, and N. K. Mondal, “Predictability by Box-Behnken model for carbaryl adsorption by soils of Indian origin,” J. Environ. Sci. Heal. - Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 626–636, 2013, doi: 10.1080/03601234.2013.777283.

T. Budinova et al., “Characterization and application of activated carbon produced by H3PO4 and water vapor activation,” Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 899–905, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.005.

S. Lecturer and S. Dawood, “Removal of Organic Micro Pollutants by Adsorption on Activated Carbon Prepared from Alhagi ( Maurorun ),” 2019.

S. Li, K. Han, J. Li, M. Li, and C. Lu, “Preparation and characterization of super activated carbon produced from gulfweed by KOH activation,” Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 243, pp. 291–300, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.052.

M. Waleed Khalid and S. D. Salman, “Adsorption of Chromium Ions on Activated Carbon Produced from Cow Bones,” Iraqi J. Chem. Pet. Eng., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 23–32, 2019, doi: 10.31699/ijcpe.2019.2.4.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Hameed, H. F., Mohammed, A. K., & Zageer, D. S. (2022). Comparative Study between Activated Carbon and Charcoal for the Development of Latent Fingerprints on Nonporous Surfaces. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, 18(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2022.09.001