Correcting Working Postures in Water Pump Assembly  Tasks using the OVAKO Work Analysis System (OWAS)

Hussein S. Ketan; Atiya Kadhim Al-Zuheri

Authors

Hussein S. Ketan Production Engineering and Metallurgy Department/ University of Technology
Atiya Kadhim Al-Zuheri Satellite Technology Center/ Directorate of Aeronautics and Space Technology Ministry of Science and Technology

Abstract

Ovako Working Postures Analyzing System (OWAS) is a widely used method for studying awkward working postures in workplaces. This study with OWAS, analyzed working postures for manual material handling of laminations at stacking workstation for water pump assembly line in Electrical Industrial Company (EICO) / Baghdad. A computer program, WinOWAS, was used for the study. In real life workstation was found that more than 26% of the working postures observed were classified as either AC2 (slightly harmful), AC3 (distinctly harmful). Postures that needed to be corrected soon (AC3) and corresponding tasks, were identified. The most stressful tasks observed were grasping, handling, and positioning of the laminations from workers. The construction of real life workstation is modified simultaneously by redesign suggestions in the values of location (positioning) factors for stacking workstation. The simulation workstation executed by mean of parametric CAD software. That modifications lead to improvement in the percentage of harmful postures. It was therefore recommended the use of supplementary methods is required to identify ergonomic risk factors for handling work or other hand-intensive activities on industry sites.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ayoub, M. M., “Problems and solutions in manual materials handling”, the state of the art. Ergonomics, 35, 713–728, (1992).
[2] Ayoub, M.M., & Mital, A., “Manual materials handling”, London, Taylor & Francis, (1989).
[3] Chaffin, D.B., & Andersson, G.B.J., “Occupational biomechanics (2d Ed.)”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, (1991).
[4] Chaffin, D.B., “Computerized biomechanical models for high exertion manual jobs”, In Proceedings of the 3rd Pan-Pacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (pp. 1–15). Seoul, Korea, (1994).
[5] Lee, I., Kee, D., Chung, M.K., & Kim, S. H. A., “Postural Workload Evaluation System Based on a Macro-postural Classification”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, Vol. 12 (3) 267–277, (2002).
[6] De Joode, B., Verspuy, C., Burdorf, and A., “Physical workload in ship maintenance: Using the Observer to solve ergonomics problems. Noldus Information Technology”, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, (2004).
[7] Lang, A., “The Correlation between Biomechanical Loads and Psychophysical Ratings”, MS thesis, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, (2000).
[8] Waters, Thomas R., et al, “Revised NIOSH Equation for the Design and Evaluation of Manual Lifting Tasks”, Ergonomics, v 36 (7), pp. 749-776, (1993).
[9] Honaker, Ronald E., “Assessing Trailer Handling Tasks: Biomechanical Modeling, Posture Categorization, Physiological Measures, and Subjective Measure”, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, (1996).
[10] Pinder, Andrew, DJ., “Benchmarking of the Manual Handling assessment Charts (MAC) ”, Health and Safety Laboratory, Broad Lane, Sheffield, UK. Electronic filename: \\ganu\ergonomics\adjp\emm\benchmarking\benchmark report.lwp, (2002).
[11] 11- Gilkey, D., Keefe, T., Bigelow, P., Herron, R., Duvall, K., Hautaluoma, J., Sesek, R., “Occupational low back pain in residential carpenters: OWAS categories and forces of compression and shear”, Denver Metro area of Colorado, Colorado, (1998).
[12] 12-Tampere university technology, occupational and safety Engineering, “WinOWAS: A Computerized System for the Analysis of Work Postures”, July 12, From the World Wide Web: http://turva.me.tut.fi/owas/,Tampere, Finland, (2003).